Act Now to Protect Funding for Biking, Walking, and Transit

ODOT is about to rewrite the rules for how Oregon invests in biking, walking and transit and it doesn’t look good.

On page 192 of next week’s Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) agenda and packet you will find Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT) proposed Funding Allocation and Project Selection Processes. This item is up for a vote on Wednesday, July 18th and could unravel years of work to establish commitments of funding to biking, walking, and transit. Please call and email the OTC to share your concerns.

Currently Oregon relies on programs such as the 1% set aside of state gas taxes to bike projects, the Federal Flexible Fund, Transportation Enhancements, and Safe Routes to School to fund transportation projects that reduce vehicle miles traveled and encourage biking, walking, and transit. Generally, the state sets up criteria within each program that encourages transportation projects to meet environmental, safety, sustainability, and livability goals. Though significantly underfunded, the current system works.

The proposal under consideration collapses all these great programs, much the way the new federal bill MAP-21 does, and allows local Area Commissions on Transportation (ACT) to spend those dollars on highway projects if they see fit. This is unacceptable. We feel as though the ACTs do not have adequate multi-modal representation or decision making structures in place to support active transportation projects.

The Bicycle Transportation Alliance is working hard to promote the following outcomes with OTC members before Wed. July 18th in order to preserve as much dedicated funding, environmental criteria, and prioritization of biking, walking and transit as possible.

  1. Preserve current funding levels for biking, walking, and transit. The OTC needs to provide direction to ODOT to ensure that programs such as the Federal Flexible Fund, Transportation Enhancements, and Safe Routes to School remain fully funded at current levels.
  2. Prioritize multi-modal projects. We are asking the OTC to create a project selection process that directs the ACTs to dedicate at least 50% of the new “Enhance” category of funds through a selection process similar to the very successful ODOT Flex Fund program criteria. These criteria need to help create healthy, livable communities.
  3. Fix the current system first. Under the new proposed process approximately 80% of funds will be allocated to fixing our current transportation system. This is fantastic policy direction from the OTC and we ask that they expand the list of projects eligible for “Fix It” funds to include completing our biking, walking, and transit networks.
  4. Adhere to Oregon’s statutory requirement to reduce green house gas emissions. The Jobs and Transportation Act of 2009 in ORS 184.610 to 184.666 directs “The Oregon Transportation Commission shall work with stakeholders to review and update the criteria used to select projects within the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. When revising the project selection criteria the commission shall consider whether the project:” … “Is consistent with the state’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and reduces this state’s dependence on foreign oil.” The only way this can happen is if explicit policy direction is established now to ensure that future transportation investments reduce our reliance on the automobile.
  5. Require any new local decision making process to include adequate multi-modal representation. ODOT has been working to improve their stakeholder outreach and engagement process through the ACTs and we ask that they continue by requiring explicit representation in the form of one seat each for public health, bicycling, pedestrian, transit, and land use representatives.

If you are able, please join the Bicycle Transportation Alliance in delivering this crucial message to the Oregon Transportation Commission members before they vote next week, on Wed. July 18th.


Comments (7)

  1. Brock Permalink  | Jul 13, 2012 06:28pm

    This is a ridiculously fast decision-making process. In Washington State, we’re still trying to figure out who will make the decision, with the final allocation decision due on September 1. Go get ’em Gerik!

  2. matt picio Permalink  | Jul 16, 2012 02:41pm

    So, Matt Garrett’s message at the Oregon Active Transportation Summit – all smoke and mirrors, then? Whatever happened to the new era of integrated transportation at the state level?

  3. Mike Claassen Permalink  | Jul 16, 2012 02:42pm

    Please keep intact the formula for bicycle, pedestrian and transit funding. Thank you, Mike Claassen, Bandon City Council, Coos County Transportation Advisory Committee

  4. Jessica Permalink  | Jul 19, 2012 01:43pm

    Any update on this? This is the first I’ve heard of this (grrr!) and it’s 7/19. My fingers are crossed it’s good news.

  5. Martha Perez, General Political Activist Permalink  | Jul 19, 2012 04:56pm

    Our region continues to experience growth, along with growing demands on our aging infrastructure, including roads, bridges, sidewalks, bike paths, arterials, commercial, and also residential streets. Part of the problem, is that one agency is responsible for a certain portion of the road, and then it becomes a piecemeal issue, as to whom controls what parts. While there are disadvantages, and advantages to this method of ownership, it is disheartening to see only parts of a highway being properly managed, while other indirectly related portions go neglected (or, underutilized, as a consequence). Funding continues to be also a huge issue, but I would also go so far, as to mention the policies that sometimes harm, rather than do good, as originally intended, in another time and age.

  6. Martha Perez, General Political Activist Permalink  | Jul 19, 2012 05:00pm

    I am concerned that Trimet does not do enough, to assist the unemployed, in terms of their transportation needs. How can workers get to jobs, if our bus agency does not have routes that go where the jobs are? Trimet is suffering from growing pains, obviously, and I see Trimet working more closely in the future with Salem, about this pressing and urgent issue. Something has to be addressed, because the number of cars always seems to be on the increase, and I understand that our government is trying to discourage solo drivers, but then again….

  7. Robbin L. Lull Permalink  | Jul 22, 2012 01:41pm

    Hello, I’m kinda new to this, so here goes…
    I didn’t know about these proposed changes…never saw them on the news, and don’t subscribe to the Oregonian.
    Since I missed all the action, could you enlighten us about “how everything turned out?”
    My wife, and I ride our bikes everywhere we go…at least for the summer…and I’m training myself, for a 12,000 mile ride for Lupus, next year…and we are concerned about the “new additions” to our Bicycle safety.
    Thank You for Your Consideration…